What’s the difference between a lawyer and a boxing referee?
A boxing referee doesn’t get paid more for a longer fight.
Tag: lawyer
What’s the difference between a lawyer and a boxing referee?
A boxing referee doesn’t get paid more for a longer fight.
What’s wrong with Lawyer jokes?
Lawyers don’t think they’re funny, and nobody else thinks they’re jokes.
The fall television season starts soon, and with it, the return of some of our most beloved entertainment franchises. Soon we’ll know the true extent of Chuck Lorre’s rage at Charlie Sheen when he offs him in the most humiliating way possible on A Man + Ashton Kutcher ÷ the Teenage Remainder. I’m pretty sure we left “House” in some kind of interesting scrape at the end of last season, although I am hard pressed to remember what it was. And then there are the shiny new shows, like Whitey, which I think stars the lady from the Progressive Insurance ads shacking up with her boyfriend as they try to save up money to buy him a shaving kit. There’s also the sci-fi show, Terra Nova, which upon cancellation will introduce us to the next generation of futuristic whiners mortally wounded that their series was not allowed to fulfill its destiny, even if that destiny was merely to be the Time Tunnel of 2011.
Most exciting of all is NBC’s bold new experiment in wasting, as egregiously as possible, the considerable talents of Will Arnett and Maya Rudolph. With little to no shame, Up All Night apparently has no more ambition than to document the hilarity of couples fighting over just who is going to get up and stick a bottle in the puling maw of a baby. Given that these TV couples apparently chose to have these TV babies, I’m not sure why this should be my TV problem. I know young parents secrete an enzyme that makes junior’s inopportune puking on various fabrics and visitors endlessly fascinating, but in the past such banal war stories have typically and mercifully circulated only among fellow parents —how NBC plans to do 22 episodes a year of dirty diaper jokes for those who don’t find little Johnny’s little shits adorable is a true mystery. Unless one of the babies is from Venus or the reincarnation of Albert Fish or something equally edgy, I’ll pass, thank you very much.
Of course, for all these new and returning shows to take to the airwaves, we must first say goodbye to the “summer” television season. Time was when there was no such thing as a summer television season—the networks simply flipped into rerun mode and assumed everyone, on both sides of the screen, had better things to do with their time. But as TV gradually came to realize that going dark for three months might, in the very near future, lead to an entire generation completely forgetting that television ever existed in the first place, the decision was made to create the illusion of exciting new programming year round.
Many complain about the quality of summer television. Not me. In fact, I’m always a little sad to see it go. Summer programming, as we have come to know it over the past few years, is like television’s feral cousin—recognizable as TV and yet unexpectedly “wild” in a way that the prestigious gloss of the autumn schedule would never abide. It’s like the dog you once rescued from traffic at the side of the Interstate: he’s cute enough that you grow a little attached to him as he lives in your basement for a few days while you put up posters; and yet he is deranged enough that you come to understand how he got left on the side of the freeway in the first place. You’re a little sad when the Humane Society finally comes to take him away, but not inconsolably so, much like the feeling you have when MTV breaks out the cattle prods to herd Ronnie and Sammi back into their enclosures until next season.
One of the highlights of this summer was undoubtedly ABC’s Wipeout, a show where mobile assemblages of bone and meat subjected themselves to a punishing obstacle course for reasons that apparently had nothing to do with either prizes or fame. In fact, I’m not even sure if Wipeout was actually a game show or just an ongoing X-treme sport product demo featuring recruits from various So-Cal fitness clubs looking to “test themselves” against the challenge of a human pachinko machine. Making it even more stupidly unfair, some off-screen tech-lord apparently had the power to activate various booby-traps at his own discretion, making sure that even the most worthy competitor eventually ended up in the drink with a broken coccyx. If, as a child, you ever wondered what it would be like to be miniaturized so that you could try to outrun the various components of “Mousetrap,” this was the show for you. Wipeout may seem like America’s take on those wacky Japanese game shows that focus on contestant pain and humiliation, but that comparison makes little to no sense given that it is almost impossible to humiliate an American, especially one appearing on television. It would seem these people decided to appear on Wipeout for little more than talking points at various Orange County juice bars; or perhaps because, to have not done so, would be to lead a life slightly less awesome.
Less strenuous but no less ridiculous has been NBC’s It’s Worth What?, a post-empire version of The Price is Right hosted by a strangely distracted, perhaps even painfully embarrassed Cedric the Entertainer (at top). Whereas The Price is Right concentrates on commonsense consumer-citizenship, rewarding viewers for actually knowing what a can of tuna or a washing machine might cost, It’s Worth What? works the freak show wing of capitalism. The conceit here is that Cedric the Entertainer has access to a giant vault filled with odd treasures from around the world. In each segment, contestants have to guesstimate the price of said objects—most of them ostensibly worthless– without fainting from shock or outrage. Quick—which costs more—a Lamborghini Spider or a mint copy of the first issue of Spiderman? The answer is almost unimportant (it’s the sports car, by a hair)—it is the question itself that is so perversely cruel. In an era of massive economic retrenchment, here we have an entire hour devoted to “Theoretical Expenditures of the Leisure Class,” reminding viewers struggling to make rent that someone out there just paid 2.35 million for a Honus Wagner baseball card.
At least It’s Worth What? feigns a “gee-whiz, rich people sure are crazy” type of populism that makes it available, however remotely, for an eventual Marxist epiphany. Over on Lifetime, however, there resides the irredeemable loathsomeness of The Picker Sisters. In what is perhaps the most tone-deaf series currently on television, here we have two noisome interior designers (apparently on loan from Extreme Makeover: Home Edition) who wander through economically depressed regions of the nation in search of hidden treasures and cute knickknacks that they might refurbish and sell in their upscale boutique back in L.A. In the episode I saw, the vulture twins spent a couple of hours swindling an older junk-gentleman in Alabama out of all kinds of odd scrap metal so that it might be stripped, powder-coated, and sold as adorable patio furniture to some copyright lawyer at Sony, a tool who will no doubt regale guests at his pool party with the interesting story of their origins (“Apparently these chairs were originally involved in the transportation of chickens in Alabama,” he laughs, reaching for another canapé. “How, I simply can’t imagine.”).
Not only is The Picker Sisters irksome for unabashedly trading in fantasies of the bi-coastal tasteful gleefully screwing over clueless rubes, it is also—quite unintentionally, I’m sure–a rather depressing documentary about the precipitous decline of the nation’s once great manufacturing base. In another segment, the gals raid an old Army depot (again, somewhere in the south), now reduced to little more than a rusting collection of obsolescent hardware. They are delighted to find an “Acid Suit” locker, a stand-alone metal closet that apparently once housed an emergency “acid suit” for that lucky soldier called upon to deal with the ominous eruption of an acid emergency in the plant. Rather than ponder the object as silent testimony to the shared dangers and selfless sacrifice of previous generations working difficult jobs for the common good of the nation, the Pickers instead declare that the locker would make a great “wet bar” for some young Hollywood bachelor. On a truck and back to L.A. it goes. With any luck, residual benzene levels will ensure that everyone involved feeds a tumor with each new Mojito.
The vaguely hypnotic Hillbilly Handfishin’, meanwhile, attempts to redress the regional antagonisms provoked by the likes of The Picker Sisters. Here unlikely handfishers from around the nation come to a lake in Oklahoma to stand around in muddy water and let freakishly gigantic catfish swim through their legs—a practice offered as the key to resolving all manner of racial, regional, sexual, and class difference. It’s an odd show, inasmuch as most of the “action” takes place under the water and the producers are apparently too cheap to spring for any submergible camera equipment. For most of the program, we watch as three visiting couples and the two hosts stand waist deep in water, occasionally shouting out with surprise, pleasure, and/or pain when a giant flathead cat swims past their thigh, giving the whole enterprise a vaguely pornographic feel (perhaps better captured in the title of the earlier fish-in-the-crotch show, Okie Noodlin’).
Speaking of slimy things swimming near your junk, Animal Planet got just about everything right in titling its summer exploitation classic: Man-Eating Super-Snake. The premise here, as I understand it, is that there is currently a rogue species of Anaconda loose in the Florida Everglades. If they begin to interbreed with another humongous snake indigenous to the area, most likely everyone weighing under 80lbs. and living south of Jacksonville will soon be dead. The few minutes of the program that I witnessed featured the requisite “slither-cam,” in this case showcasing “man-eating super snake” as he made his way toward a crib. I assume the baby was rescued at the last second and everyone learned an important safety lesson, like not leaving your baby’s crib at the edge of a swamp, but I can’t say for sure.
Of course, the summer friends I will miss the most are the freaks, the glorious, glorious freaks, especially those lost souls that we got to meet in the second season of TLC’s My Strange Addiction. Who could forget the gas-huffing Mom or the grown woman who took her creepy stuffed animals everywhere? The woman who bathed thrice daily in bleach or the hipster taxidermist obsessively prowling the streets of Brooklyn in search of dead mice to stuff? And who could forget Teresa, she who eats rocks, and Casie, she who eats the ashes of her dead husband? If you somehow missed either of these segments over the summer, I highly recommend them both. Teresa was especially amazing in that she apparently really eats rocks, not by swallowing little pebbles, mind you, but by actually taking great big crunchy bites out of large, hard rocks—teeth, intestines, and foley sweetening be damned!
I have come to love My Strange Addiction so much that I fear it may have peaked this season, so in the interest of having some good kooks for next summer, I will end here with the casting call currently posted at TLC. If you are really screwed up, I beseech you, for my own personal entertainment pleasure, to share your story with us all:
MY STRANGE ADDICTION
Think you have an unusual compulsive behavior or strange habit? Do you find it consuming you, affecting your life, work and relationships? If you or someone you know is suffering from a strange addiction and would be interested in participating in our program, please send us a short description of your unusual behavior and the impact it has on your daily life to: casting@20west.tv. Please make sure to include your name, age, city of residence, a current photo, and a phone number or email where you can be reached for further questions.
“Earlier today Herman Cain rejected calls that he should withdraw from the race. He said, ‘It ain’t gonna happen!’ That’s what he said. Ironically, that’s what women say to him when he’d put his hand up their skirt.” -Jay Leno
“It was so beautiful in New York City today, that Herman Cain accusers were holding press conferences in the park.” -David Letterman
The harassment allegations keep coming at Herman Cain — like an uninvited hand up a pleated skirt.” -Stephen Colbert
“A fourth woman came forward with accusations of sexual harassment dating back to the late ’90s. Her name is Sharon Bialek and her lawyer is Gloria Allred. I think Gloria Allred has a press podium in her living room for instances just like this.” -Jimmy Kimmel
“There’s a fifth woman that claims to have had a problem with Herman Cain. If this keeps up, it seems very unlikely he will be president, although it seems more and more likely he will become governor of California.” -Jimmy Kimmel
“Herman Cain says he will not quit. He is going to stay in the race. You know what that means? He’ll be gone in a week.” -David Letterman
[Originally published September 14, 2011.]
- – -
Available now from Voice of Witness, Patriot Acts: Narratives of Post-9/11 Injustice, is edited by Alia Malek, an author (A Country Called Amreeka) and former Department of Justice attorney. A groundbreaking collection of oral histories, Patriot Acts tells the stories of men and women who have been needlessly swept up in the War on Terror. In their own words, narrators recount personal experiences of the post-9/11 backlash that have deeply altered their lives and communities. For more information about Voice of Witness visit voiceofwitness.org.
- – -
On March 24, 2005, Adama Bah, a sixteen-year-old Muslim girl, awoke at dawn to discover nearly a dozen armed FBI agents inside her family’s apartment in East Harlem. They arrested her and her father, Mamadou Bah, and transported them to separate detention facilities. A government document leaked to the press claimed that Adama was a potential suicide bomber but failed to provide any evidence to support this claim. Released after six weeks in detention, Adama was forced to live under partial house arrest with an ankle bracelet, a government-enforced curfew, and a court-issued gag order that prohibited her from speaking about her case. In August of 2006, Adama’s father was deported back to Guinea, Africa. Adama, who had traveled to the United States with her parents from Guinea as a child, also found herself facing deportation. She would spend the next few years fighting for asylum and struggling to support her family in the United States and Guinea.
- – -
The morning of March 24, 2005, my family and I were in the house sleeping.
Someone knocked on the door, and my mom went and opened it. These men barged in, waking us up. I always sleep with the blanket over my head. They pull the blanket off my head, I look up, I see a man. He said, “You’ve got to get out!” I’m like, What the hell, what’s going on?
I saw about ten to fifteen people in our apartment and right outside our door in the hallway. They were mostly men, but there were two women. Some had FBI jackets, and others were from the police department and the DHS. We were all forced out of the bed and told to sit in the living room. They were going through papers, throwing stuff around, yelling and talking to each other, then whispering. I heard them yelling at my mother in the background, and my mom can’t speak much English, and they were pulling her into the kitchen, yelling at her, “We’re going to deport you and your whole family!”
This whole time, I was thinking, What’s going on? What are they talking about? I knew my dad had an issue with his papers, but I didn’t think that my mom did. They kept saying, “We’re going to send all of you back to your country.”
Then I saw my dad walking in, in handcuffs. They had gone to the mosque to get him. It was the scariest thing you could ever see; I had just never seen my father so powerless. He was always this guy you didn’t mess with. If he said do it, you did it. He was just someone you didn’t cross paths with.
They took him to the kitchen, whispered something to him.
He sat down, looked at us. He said, “Everything’s going to be fine, don’t worry.”
And then I knew nothing was fine, I knew something was wrong. They told him to tell us what was going on. He told us that they were going to arrest him and they were going to take him away.
The FBI agents told me to get up and get my sneakers. I was thinking they wanted to see my sneaker collection. I have all types of colors of sneakers. I went and grabbed them. I said, “I have this one, I have this one, I have this one.”
One of the agents said, “Choose one.”
My favorite color is blue, so I picked up a blue pair and said, “This one.”
He said, “Put them on.”
I said, “Okay, but I know they fit me.”
He said, “Put them on!” He was very nasty. Then he said, “All those earrings have to go out.” I have eight piercings on each side, a nose ring, and a tongue ring. I went to the kitchen to take them off, and they followed me in there.
My breath was stinking. I asked, “Can I at least brush my teeth? My breath stinks really bad. Can I use the bathroom?”
They said, “No. We have to go. You’re coming with us.”
I said, “Where am I going to go? Am I going with my dad?” I put on my jacket. They let me put my headscarf and abaya on. Then one of the women took out handcuffs. I panicked so badly, I was stuttering, “What did I do? Where are we going?”
First time in my life, I’m sixteen years old, in handcuffs. I looked at my dad, and he said, “Just do what they say.”
My mom didn’t know I was going. When we got out the door, she said, “Where she go? Where she go?” the agents said, “We’re taking her,” and they held my mom back. The man who seemed to be in charge put his hands on my mother to stop her.
They took me and my dad and put us in the same car. I was scared. I said to him, “What’s going on? What’s going to happen?” My dad said, “Don’t say anything, we’re going to get a lawyer. It’s okay, everything is going to be fine.”
There were two Escalades driving with us. I was looking around, paying attention. I recognized the Brooklyn Bridge, I recognized a lot of landmarks, but I didn’t recognize the building where my father and I were taken. We got out of the car and we walked past a security booth where the cars drive up to, before taking a ramp beneath the building to the parking lot. Once we were inside the building, they put me in my own cell. It was white, with a bench. No bars. No windows. There was a door that had a tiny glass pane, and I could see who was out there. I just saw a bunch of computers and tables, and people walking back and forth and talking. I kept seeing them talk to my dad.
I don’t know how long I was in there.
I was nervous, I was panicking, I was crying, I was trying to figure out what was going on. And I was constantly using the bathroom.
The toilet was an open toilet, though. There was a camera on the ceiling in the middle of the room. I was wondering, Can they see me peeing? I just wrapped blankets around me as I was peeing.
- – -
Hours later, Adama was removed from her cell for questioning, during which she learned that she was not, in fact, a U.S. citizen. While being fingerprinted, she saw that another teen from her mosque, named Tashnuba, had also been detained. Here, she recounts her final interrogation before being transported to a detention facility in Pennsylvania.
- – -
Finally I was brought to another room. This room had a table, a chair on one side, and two chairs on the other side. A federal agent walked in. She said, “I need to talk to you about something.” The questions she was asking had nothing to do with immigration. They were terrorism questions. She asked me about people from London, about people from all over the world. I thought, What’s going on?
The male interrogator told me that the religious study group Tashnuba was part of had been started by a guy who was wanted by the FBI. I had no idea if that was true or not.
The study group at the mosque was all women. So it was women learning about religion, women’s empowerment, why we cover, how we do the prayer, when to pray, things like that. It was more for converts and new people who had just come into Islam. There was nothing about jihad or anything like that.
I wasn’t part of the group, but Tashnuba was. We were the same age, sixteen. So, they asked me about this group and they told me they’d taken my computer and my diary. My diary was a black-and-white notebook. I had phone numbers, I had notes, I had stories in it, I had everything. Basically, they asked me about every contact in there, they asked me about every little thing. But, there’s nothing in there about jihad, there’s nothing in there about anything that’s suspicious. There was nothing in there at all. So I wasn’t worried.
They said, “We have your computer, we can find whatever you’re hiding.”
I said, “Go ahead, look in my computer. I have nothing to hide.”
They kept making a scene, like there was something big there. They said, “Don’t lie to us. If you lie to us, we’ll have proof, we’ll catch you in your lie.”
I knew there was nothing in my computer, but at the end of the day, I started to doubt myself. I thought, Okay, what’s going on now? Is there something there? Their technique is to make you doubt yourself. But then I thought, Wait a minute, I’m not this person. What are they talking about?
The interrogation lasted a long time. This Secret Service guy came in. He asked me how I felt about Bush. I said, “I don’t like him.” I was being very honest with them. There was nothing to hide.
The Secret Service guy was just too aggressive. He said, “I don’t understand—why do you choose to cover when women choose to wear less and less every day?”
I said, “It’s freedom of choice. Some people want to show some stuff, some people want to hide things. Some people want to preserve their bodies, some people don’t want to. They want to show it to the whole world.”
He said, “I don’t understand. You’re young, why are you doing this?”
Then they asked me about Tashnuba. They asked me about her name, they asked me about her family, but I told them, “I don’t know her.”
They said, “Tashnuba wrote you on this list.”
I said, “What list?”
They said, “She signed you up to be a suicide bomber.”
I said, “Are you serious? Why would she do that? She doesn’t seem like that type of person.”
They were trying to make me seem like I was wrong about who I knew and who I didn’t know.
- – -
To purchase Patriot Acts: Narratives of Post-9/11 Injustice, please visit our store.
To read reviews and to see a schedule of appearances by editor Alia Malek, please go here.
At a moment when the mire of my grief threatened to subsume me, I made the decision to seek delight. I set about entangling myself with a dazzling iconoclast whom I had known and admired for many years. He required no convincing. The beauty of the thing was that it fit into the cracks of my life and of his: lunches and late nights and weekend afternoon snacks. The awfulness of the thing was that it turned out we were very fond of one another. Awful mostly in that I was still married. He was also not single. And this relationship was never intended for the realm of fairytale endings. In its effort to escape the sad morass, my grief-bound heart had reached for distraction and instead found itself in the gulag of an infatuation so all-consuming, my world rang with the song of it like the white noise of the ocean in a shell. If love is a mixtape, infatuation is a broken record; a single song played at a deafening volume. When things get star-crossed enough, you start to live inside the lyrics, and sometimes, it seems not half bad. This is how it went with my iconoclast for a while. During these months Neko Case sang “I’m an Animal” and it echoed everywhere.
“I do my best, but I’m made of mistakes…I’m an animal. You’re an animal too.”
Much of my time with the iconoclast was a bubble of Peter Pan hedonism: champagne cocktails, giggling, marathon naps, bootlegged 1980s TV comedies, and ohdeargod sex. I relished the chance to hide in the surface with him and not apologize for the joy I found there. Sometimes, we’d lay awake at night and drop our diving bells into the deep sea of sadness and longing and existential terror. We were godless and fearless and certain only that there was nothing more than this. We fought intensely about his intractability, my selfishness. He lectured. I pouted. Neko Case again:
“This Tornado Loves You. This Tornado loves you. What will make you believe me?”
When I found myself crying in bed with him a week after Lev’s funeral, I knew my first attempt to break it off with the iconoclast (after he had forgotten my birthday) had not, in fact, been successful. I began to search earnestly for something to distract me from my distraction. My casual dalliance with the iconoclast had become real and challenging and I found myself wanting something less; someone new, something other, but nothing more. The Blond Poet was (until he wasn’t) a welcome diversion fueled, in part, by my drive to erase my desire for the iconoclast (whose siren song I was able to ignore in favor of the poet’s for a brief while). Post-poet, I resisted the easy comfort of going back to Neverland. Instead, I took Joss home to my parents’ house in Albany and walked the blizzard-paralyzed city. I walked my parents’ neighborhood at night and watched the snow shine in the halos of streetlights, listened for the familiar squeaks and pops as my feet pressed the fresh-fallen powder into the texture of Styrofoam on the sidewalks under my boots.
On a late December afternoon, with the tinsel-bloat of Christmas still clinging to everything, I hovered outside a store in the mall while my mother and son shopped, busying myself with my phone as contemporary folks do. After weeks of nothing, my iconoclast had texted to tell me he wanted to take my photo. He’d discovered one last roll of Kodachrome—the iconic slide film, now discontinued—he’d need to shoot in the next 24 hours and send for processing before the last remaining lab in the country quit developing it at the turn of the new year. My heart swelled then broke a little. I was nowhere near, nor would I be for days. That we’d be star-crossed yet again was no bolt from the blue. It was just as well, really. No happy ending.
“You’ll be a hard act to follow, A bitter pill to swallow, You’ll be tough, you’ll be tough to replace.” — Rolling Stones “Plundered My Soul”
After the poet, there was a flirtation with a recent Brown graduate with Vampire Weekend sunglasses and a Harvard scarf. He’d battled cancer and was about to enter medical school. He picked me a flower on his way to our first date. He wanted me to be impressed by these things. But I was not — my ex-husband graduated from Brown; my son died of cancer; I work in a hospital simply lousy with doctors. What else have you got, sir? He told me I made him nervous. And he gave up. Next, there was the PhD candidate from out of town with whom I thought I was developing a friendship founded in vocabulary and misfit snobbery. I thought him quite lovely on our afternoon at the museum, but he turned out, in truth, to be a gloomy misogynist who seemed to feel the principles of eminent domain were valid reasons why his tongue kept ending up in my mouth. After that debacle, I caved, went back to the well. I felt not the slightest bit distracted, but I kept on trying. In the spring, there was the lawyer, who on the strength of his looks and kisses lasted the longest, but was not in fact, well suited to me at all. My description of him prompted the iconoclast to ask: “Will you fall in love with him and stop coming to see me?” Obviously not.
“The storms are raging on the rolling sea, and on the highway of regret. The winds of change are blowing wild and free. You ain’t seen nothing like me yet. I could make you happy, make your dreams come true. Nothing that I wouldn’t do. Go to the ends of the earth for you, to make you feel my love…” — Adele (singing Bob Dylan’s words) “Make You Feel My Love”
In my experience, stemming the tide of one’s own brooding infatuation consists mainly of not continuing to sleep with the person who reduces you to a quivering mess. At this, I was a failure many times over. All manner of poet-shaped and other distractions served as evidence that perhaps my destiny, for a while at least, lay in this relationship that had begun as a distraction from the day-to-day slog of my crumbled and crumbling life and had come to be a security blanket I wasn’t yet ready to give up. Perhaps it was not love or lust that would save me from my sadness. Perhaps I needed another outlet. I contemplated taking a group sewing class, but thought something more physical was probably in order. I looked into ballet. Once, I ran with my dog. But I got winded and felt like an asshole and promptly gave up. The nightlife was more my comfort zone, but what in the hell could I do there other than meet new boys to break my heart worse?
On one of his visits to town, I brought the PhD candidate to a comedy festival. I was friends with the guy who ran the thing so we had great seats and got to schmooze a bit and feel important. I had attended the same festival the year before and fallen head over heels in hero-worship with one of the comics. He was on the bill again this night and I was positively bursting at the seams to watch his new material. His set brought me to tears. Not tears of laughter, actual overflowing soul-deep tears. His work was insightful and reasoned and philosophical while simultaneously being biting and hilarious and moving. I laughed too, of course, as hard as a person can laugh and still take in enough oxygen to stay conscious. Listening to this comedian kill made me as happy as I had been since Lev died. This. This was bliss.
I had been contemplating for a while the concept of trying stand-up comedy. Making light of the worst life had to offer was my one and only effective coping mechanism and my tendency toward dazzle camouflage made me unafraid of putting on a show. At one point, in passing, I had bounced the idea off the iconoclast. Should I try stand-up? He reacted immediately. His eyes got wide and he told me I shouldn’t. Changed the subject. I was so stunned, I didn’t ask why. Regardless of the reason, I had held it in the back of my mind, felt maybe I needed to prove to myself that I was cut from the cloth of my idols. But could I do it? Could I own the room? Could I even get my shit together enough to do three minutes at an open mic? It would be a new kind of writing for me. It would take pathos and sincerity and boundless cynicism. And patience. I would be able to focus on very little else. And I would keep it from the iconoclast. I would do it for the first time in St. Louis where I was headed for work in the spring. I had two months to plan and write. Fucking perfect. Done and done.
I had all of these thoughts and made the decision to venture into comedy in a fog of punch lines and endorphins during some wisp of a second between comedians. The PhD candidate and I went for a drink after the show and geeked out about the amazingness of what we’d just seen. At the end of the night he surprised me by trying to make out with me in a parking garage and we didn’t see each other again. I didn’t tell him about my plan to tell jokes onstage. I didn’t tell anyone for a while. I was all jacked up with frustrated energy, which I poured into joke writing. And I was more than tenacious enough to get up on stage when I had the jokes to fill the time. I didn’t care if I was awful (though somehow I knew I wouldn’t be). I would be better eventually. And someday, I would kill.
One humid July evening in 2010, my agent called to ask if I’d be willing to leave Chicago for a spot opening up in the revival of La Cage aux Folles. I had been in Chicago for over three years at that point, and had more or less stopped auditioning. But the idea of being able to say (to whom, I wasn’t sure) that I had done not one but two Broadway shows still had the appealing ring of achievement to it, even if it meant I’d have to do some seriously strenuous choreography dressed as a French showgirl eight times a week as one of the Cagelles in La Cage aux Folles.
For the La Cage audition, my agent told me to be prepared to learn a dance combination or two, sing sixteen bars of a traditional musical theater song, and perform a routine in full drag to a recording of “It’s Raining Men.” The audition was to be the following morning at ten, and my agent seemed to assume I was in possession of a trunk overflowing with heels, a room in my apartment reserved solely for wigs, and a fully choreographed routine and developed drag persona ready to perform on a moment’s notice. I was in possession of none of the above.
I’m the swing at Chicago, which means I am at the theater every night like the rest of the cast. But unlike everyone else, whose bodies are put through the grind of performing eight shows a week, I either watch the evening’s performance or sit in my dressing room for two and a half hours, doing things like reading, watching TV, or, on that humid night in July, working on my drag persona. That is, unless one of the ensemble guys is out sick or on vacation or is injured in the middle of the performance. Then, of course, I throw on my costume, run down the six flights of stairs, and get myself onstage.
When the Chicago overture began that night and I was alone in my dressing room, I sat down at my spot in front of the light bulb lined mirror, opened my laptop, and began searching YouTube for clips of drag queens doing their drag-show thing. To be honest, drag queens had always scared the shit out of me. They were often so abrasive, so hostile toward their audience, and all that garish makeup, those games of illusion, had a way of making me queasy. The few times I’d been to drag shows, I’d been reminded of the jitters I felt as a seven year old, watching my older cousin play soccer. Sitting in the bleachers, I had always been terrified I’d for some reason be forced to join in and play the game, too. Just as I’d always known I was embarrassingly terrible at soccer, I’ve always held the deep-seated belief that I’m just not man enough to convincingly pull off dressing like a woman.
I started looking around my cluttered, triangular dressing room for something to either inspire or save me from that audition. But between the crumbling plaster walls, the mildewed plastic shower stall in the corner, the harsh florescent lights, the racks of faded mesh costumes, and the sealed shut, blacked out window that faced a parking garage, I was finding neither inspiration nor salvation. I started wondering if I really wanted a second Broadway show all that badly.
I closed my laptop, ready to call my agent back and cancel the audition appointment. Then my eyes fell on the stack of books I kept on my dressing room table. Beneath volumes of John Cheever and Chekhov short stories was a copy of Me and My Shadows, a memoir by Lorna Luft. Ms. Luft is the woman who has spent her life unfortunately known as Judy Garland’s other daughter. A friend of mine was the book’s editor and had recently given me a copy (which, I am not ashamed to admit, had made me really, really excited). I had always had a thing about Judy. When I was growing up, family-bonding time had, after all, included renting old MGM musicals, eating oversized bowls of popcorn, and shushing each other for singing along with the songs and reciting the dialogue to the movies we’d seen again and again and again. More than once or twice, I had faked elaborate illnesses to stay home from school to watch a Fred Astaire or Gene Kelly marathon on AMC. But it had always been all about Judy Garland for me; that vulnerability, that impeccable comedic timing, and, of course, that voice.
I flipped through the photos of Ms. Lorna’s memoir, then reopened my computer and found Judy doing “Get Happy” in her black blazer and fedora on YouTube. It had been years since I’d watched that clip, but obsessive viewings of the That’s Entertainment series in my adolescence seemed to have stuck with me. Somehow, the choreography came galloping to the front of my brain and out my limbs as if I’d been rehearsing it every day for years. I then pulled up a recording of “It’s Raining Men” and danced Judy’s choreography to its disco beat. Suddenly, without a wig or makeup or heels, I was doing drag, and I found myself thinking, inexplicably, of my father.
It wasn’t my father’s many appearances on the community theater stages around Maryland that I was recalling. Rather, I was hearing his words and directives as he coached me for a role in Adventure Theater Summer Day Camp’s production of Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat. I was nine years old and playing the Pharaoh, an Elvis inspired character that got to sing a killer rock song at the beginning of Act II. Nearly every day of that three-week summer session, I would come home from camp, dunk my head in the bathroom sink, then sculpt my hair into a pompadour with a squirt of Dep gel the size of five stacked quarters. I would then run through my song, choreography and all, six times in front of the mirror until my dad yelled up to tell me it was time for dinner. After dinner, I’d ask him to help me work on my moves, and the coaching would begin.
“It’s the element of surprise,” my father said to me. “Let’s try it again.”
I was standing on my bed, my sister’s hairbrush clasped in my right hand like a microphone. My five-year-old brother, Max, stood at the foot of the bed, aping my swiveled stance. My dad pressed play on the boom box and a steady descending baseline from the original Broadway cast recording of Joseph pounded out. I began popping my knee in time to the music, my lip curling up. My dad had told me that the trick to being a great performer was to surprise the audience: just when they think they can predict who you are and what you’ll do, you give them a spasm, a shift that springs from stillness, and bam, you’re entirely reinvented in their eyes.
I sang along with the recording, the Mississippi drawl I’d gleaned from repeated listenings of “Jailhouse Rock” sticking to the tune automatically. I ended the song on one knee, swinging my arm into a triumphant fist pump on the final button. My brother and dad applauded while I sat down on the bed, wiping sweat from my forehead and neck.
“That was better,” Max said, jumping up and down on my bed. “I thought that was really better.”
“Good, Briny,” my dad said. “Let’s take it from the verse again. This time remember: focus your gaze, find that stillness.”
I knew that if I absorbed my dad’s advice, I could make my performance great. But it had been my experience that the perfect costume could elevate any performance from great to legendary. I figured that whatever Carol, Adventure Theater’s bobbed costume mistress, had cooked up for me that year would help me focus and find something close to that perfect stillness.
“The Pharaoh is the king,” Carol said later that week, handing me a gold sequined vest in the theater’s mothball-scented dressing room. “That’s why Andrew Lloyd Webber is a genius. Do you get it? Pharaoh? The King? Elvis is the King? Genius.”
I was starting to put the vest on over my t-shirt when Carol said, “Try on the whole shebang, no T-shirt under that vest. Let’s get the total effect.”
Moments later, I moved out from behind the dressing curtain and stood on a square platform before the three-way mirror. The gold vest twinkled above my bare torso and reached just below my bottom ribs. I was a chunky nine-year-old, and my stomach hung over the black spandex biker shorts Carol had given me. I sucked in my belly button and, fingers shaking, began to button the gold vest.
“No, no,” Carol said, slapping my hand away. “Give the people what they’re paying for.”
I turned from side to side, taking in my image from every angle of the three-way mirror. There he was, a little Jewish boy from Potomac in a sparkling sequined vest and black spandex shorts, standing in front of a mirror, thinking he was Elvis.
“And now for the final touch,” Carol said, bending down to help me into the rhinestone-studded gold platform shoes she held. I slid my feet into the shoes and teetered for a moment before finding my balance.
“Look out, Adventure Theater,” Carol said. “Elvis has officially entered the building.”
On the day of the Joseph performance, I stood upstage center on an elevated platform, hidden by a network of overlapping bamboo fans. When I finally heard my cue—a descending bass line plunked out from the piano in the orchestra pit—the bamboo fans parted to reveal Elvis in spandex and a sequined gold vest, standing with feet wide, chin down over the right shoulder, holding a microphone. I snapped my head to the audience and sang the verse through a curled lip. Blinded by lights and glittering harem girl outfits around me, I couldn’t see the faces in the audience, only blurred outlines of heads bobbing and swaying to the music.
The number sailed by, every movement and vocal lick I’d been rehearsing with my dad came tumbling out in perfect, dynamic succession. As I jumped from the elevated platform in my gold platform shoes, I strode through my choreography, sure of my footing, fully believing myself to be the king. Finally, the tempo slowed to half time for the big finish. I got down on one knee, sang the last notes with everything I had, then pumped the air with my fist. The lights bumped to a white heat and the audience leapt to their feet, screaming and applauding, as I remained frozen in my final pose. Over top of the applause, I heard my dad’s familiar, sustained, Woooohooooooo. I turned my head to the audience to smile and say into the microphone, “Thank you. Thank you very much.”
As I watched myself in the dressing room mirror nearly twenty years later, reaching up with splayed fingers like Judy Garland, leaning back with the microphone for a long note like Judy Garland, rocking my hips over bent knees like Judy Garland, wobbling slightly and gesturing with crooked elbows and loose wrists like Judy Garland, I could hear my dad’s voice telling me to focus my gaze, to plant my feet, to find that perfect stillness. It was odd, and a little unnerving, that though I knew my dad was sitting in his office overlooking Farragut Square, reviewing legal briefs and facilitating transactions, he was also reflected back at me in the dressing room mirror, helping me become a chorus boy who was man enough to perform in drag.
The audition for La Cage aux Folles went better than I could have anticipated. I can-canned with a flexibility I didn’t know I still had; I leapt in the air and landed in the splits wearing the black strappy heels I’d borrowed from Chicago. I sang my sixteen bars of music (wearing loafers, not heels), and, when it was time, I put on my black blazer and black fedora and got ready to do Judy. I told myself it would be better to look like I wasn’t trying too hard, so I didn’t wear makeup or a wig or even the black pantyhose I’d brought along. I did my Judy impersonation in front of not only the creative team and the casting directors, but also the dozen or so other guys auditioning who were, by and large, in much more involved states of dress than I was. One guy wore a full-on Geisha costume; another did a flamenco routine in a fringe skirt with a rose in his long, black wig. Others went the more wild and raunchy drag queen route, wearing huge, teased wigs, and glittery tube tops while accosting their audience of auditioners with lap dances and pelvic thrusts.
When it was my turn to take the floor, I was clammy with nerves, but hoped my visible trembling was adding authenticity to my Judy impression and perhaps making up for my half-assed costume. As “It’s Raining Men” wailed from the rehearsal room speakers, I found it impossible to, even for a moment, focus my gaze or find any kind of stillness at all. My mind kept leaving the audition room to think about my dad.
I often wonder what kind of performer he would have been had he dedicated his life to music instead of to us, his family. He had been an oboe student in the competitive conservatory at Oberlin, but had packed up his oboe after graduation, gotten a Masters in social work, and, after marrying my mother, went to law school so he could provide for her in the manner to which he thought they ought to become accustomed. His oboe sat locked in its case next to the upright piano at our house for years, then was buried in the storage room, where it remained while he built his law practice, shuttled us to and from dance classes and rehearsals, and coached us on our endless string of performances.
I’ve tried to picture my father seated on stage, illuminated by a single spotlight, playing his oboe and swaying to its rhythms. Would he have been flashy and demonstrative when he played? Or would he have been subtle and subdued, allowing the music to speak for itself? I don’t think I’ll ever know for sure. He has refused to play that oboe for as long as I can remember, claiming that the squeaking would be unbearable to our trained ears. But the last time I was home in Maryland, I did notice that my father’s oboe, still in its closed case, had made its way out of the storage room and was sitting next to the antique upright piano in the living room. I didn’t ask him if he’d started playing it again. I figured that if he had, it was something he was doing, finally, just for himself, in his own rare moments of stillness.
When I finished my Judy routine, I wobbled over to the side of the rehearsal room, allowing the next guy to strut his glittery, shimmery stuff. I leaned against the wall, panting, my ankles throbbing.
In the end, I didn’t get that role in La Cage aux Folles. It went to the one guy at the audition whose agent had failed to tell him to wear drag, a cute little blond with a muscley body who had simply stripped down to his underwear and shaken what he had to offer for the creative team.
I went back to Chicago that night and the boys in my dressing room agreed I would have been miserable doing jump splits in heels eight times a week, and that it was good I hadn’t booked the job. When the stage manager called places, I opened my collection of Cheever short stories and the rest of the boys descended the six flights of stairs to the stage, ready to do yet another performance.
The reality that I might never do another Broadway show began to sink in. My mind started sorting through options of what else I could do with my life. Maybe I’d look into psychology; maybe I could be a professor of English; maybe I could find some rich dude who wanted to buy me things. I thought for a moment of what it would be like to go to law school. Then I thought back to one night when I was nine or ten years old, sitting around the dinner table with my family. My dad was telling us about some negotiation he was handling for the commuter rail agency in LA, and how they’d spent two full hours that day arguing over one single word of the agreement. When he had finished speaking, I looked at him, shook my head and said, “Daddy, I will never, ever be a lawyer.”
My father had looked back at me with his broad, easy smile and said, “That’s a good thing, my boy. I think that’s a very good thing.”
Dear Complaining Mother,
About the “obscene hand gesture” you mentioned in your letter to park management. Had I fingers, or even hands, I might confirm your sighting of same—wearing a badly-stained dog costume ten hours a day yields a bracingly low reward:loss of dignity ratio.
But, mother, we’re talking about two asymmetrical gobbets of burlap-enforced, Sno-Kone-and-chili-dog-encrusted fabric, neither of which I’m able to manipulate into anything resembling specific motion, let alone condemnatory gesture. Gesture-wise, I’m a non-starter. Like, I tried to communicate via A.S.L. with a kid in a school group one day? People thought I was trying to signal that I’d caught on fire.
But I grant you—some days, the finger would be a relief. Something to particularize the despair, you know? We’re so bare bones here at Animal Legends that the bones are getting a little shardy. We’re talking, no animatronics. No c.g.i. No harnesses. Nothing but felt.
All of which breeds the discontent specific to the park that is blighted by both corporate malaise and limited licensing fees. I mean, you try to calm the kid who’s been told he can’t ride the William Shat-narwhal or the Stan Musialbatross because their breathing apparatuses need new mouthpieces; you tell a vanload of seniors that they won’t be cavorting anytime soon with the inoperative Eunicecorn Shriver. It hurts the heart.
As do your accusations. Even though, a finger’s the least of it. In fact, thank you for the finger, mother. Thank you for the way the finger obscures all the other stuff—the times I’ve told whiny parents that the bathrooms are located several miles from the park, just under the crust of the earth. The time I told the kid baffled by the identities of Sharpei-braham Lincoln and Manateena Sinatra that they are very, very minor “Shrek” characters. The time a kid asked me why I was wearing a “You can pet me today!” button and I told him, “So you can feel my disease.”
I’m not proud of any of this. Regrets, I have a few. But when your professional life is predicated solely upon your once having fit into a soul-crushing fur sack, you get a different vantage point on things. One time a mother shook the excess fabric on my arms and said, “Guess you’re still growing?” So I nodded my headpiece and said, “Like fingernails on a corpse.”
But we’re not even talking about that stuff. We’re merely talking about posing for pictures—a service, I should add, that I offer parkgoers without expectation of gratuity or even compliment.
And this is where the mind boggles, mother. You’re telling me that you bring a kid to a germ laboratory where he will ingest car-sized portions of artery-clogging food prior to his being hurled about in the air by rusted pieces of metal that are curiously absent of inspection stickers, and all you can come up with is “Chow Chow En- Lai gave my kid the finger!”? O, mother—I applaud your audacity! ‘Tis you with the engorged glandular bits betwixt your hindquarters! Your sense of self outdoes even Dudley Mooreangutan’s.
Look, I realize that most people don’t want to hear the truth. People don’t want to know that a costumed character with only one facial expression may in fact be experiencing a rainbow of emotion. The mouth-less Hello Kitty cannot even respond to the salutation that is her name.
However, to the extent that anyone wants to hear how a man who spends his life inside a chow chow costume actually feels—that word, “felt”: kind of ironic now, am I right?—I’m going to tell you where I’m at.
For the record: inasmuch as I am able to give you, or any parkgoer, the finger, I did. Which is to say, I gave you the paw. Paw you, mom. Paw you, and all your motherpawing lawyers.
Respectfully,
Premier Chow Chow En-Lai
The biggest story in the world today is miniaturization. Telephones, computers, batteries: the world of today is the world of yesterday writ small. And yet, writing is the one area where this principle does not apply. In part, this has been because the Internet and handheld devices possess a theoretically unlimited reading area. Web pages [like this one] can scroll down almost limitlessly. An electronic reader can just as easily contain a thousand pages as a hundred. As a result, miniaturization of text has been deemed unnecessary; instead, what has been prized has been readability.
I tell you this because roughly a decade ago I began work on a technology that would permit the extreme shrinking of text. At the time, fonts could be rendered as small as four points in size, or maybe even three, but this was nowhere close to what I hoped to achieve. I confessed my ambition to my wife. “I want to become an expert in miniaturization,” I said.
“You already are,” she said. “If you know what I mean.” She scowled at me. “Anyway, I have to go help a friend with something. I won’t be back until late.”
My ambition, once it appeared, would not fade. I could not acquire funding, for the reasons outlined above, and yet I would not be deterred. I managed to make text that was one point, then even smaller, but I was still far from my goal.
Then, five years ago, Twitter was invented, and my motivation surged. Some may see a technology that restricts all messages to 140 characters as a limit; I saw it as limitless opportunity. “I’m going to start in on this project more seriously now,” I told my wife.
“I’m out of town this weekend,” she said. “Possibly the beginning of next week, too.”
By the time she returned—I think it was a Thursday—I had designed this: .
To the untrained eye, it looks an ordinary boldface period. But the untrained eye, as Tycho Brahe was fond of saying, is an idiot. What appears to be an ordinary period is in fact a TwitDot that contains a message that could never, as a result of its length, have fit within the confines of a single tweet. What message, you ask? “What appears to be an ordinary period is in fact a TwitDot, and it contains a message that could never, as a result of its length, have fit within the confines of a single tweet.” It lacks, perhaps, the poetry of Morse’s “What hath God wrought?” or the urgency of Graham Bell’s “Mr. Watson—come here—I want to see you,” And yet, it has something just as important: a longer length than either. “I wish you had that,” my wife said.
“What?” I said.
“Nothing,” she said. “I’m going dancing. Don’t wait up.”
That first TwitDot could hold only about forty words, due to electronic emulsification instability. In the months that followed, I labored to increase the capacity of the TwitDot. Then finally, one day, it all came together. I remember it clearly. I had been on my own since early evening, when my wife had gone to dinner with some friends. Tired, my concentration ebbing, I accidentally dropped a negatively charged nanoprong onto a stretched rubber sheet and was shocked to find that the dot that remained had a capacity of roughly ten pages. I could not believe it. I called my wife. “I finished,” I said.
“I’ve heard that more times than I would care to count,” she said. “I’m hanging up. Dessert is here.”
As a test, I sent myself a tweet: .
Again, this may look like a message that consists of nothing more than a simple period, but it is in fact a mature TwitDot that contains the entire Declaration of Independence, with only a handful of minor transport errors (for example, the TwitDot, after transmission, rendered the opening clause “When, in the horse of human events”). I was almost done. I called my wife back and told her we were ready for soft launch. “You always are,” she said. “Anyway, still eating dessert.”
Over the next three months, I tweeted out a series of TwitDots. Here are some of them:
.
This TwitDot contains the first ten chapters of the Book of Genesis.
.
This TwitDot contains Walt Whitman’s Leaves of Grass.
.
This one has the lyrics to “Layla” and then nine blank pages.
The genius of the TwitDot, of course, is that it need not stand alone. They are even more useful when set in context, as in this tweet:
Many people don’t know the first thing about Peruvian history: .
The TwitDot, in this case, carries a detailed account of the country, beginning with the Inca and extending through the Viceroyalty into the early years of the Republic. Similarly, consider this tweet:
Nice day today. .
While the first period is just a period, the second is a TwitDot that compares today’s weather with the weather of similar dates, stretching back nearly a century, with the intent of proving the proposition advanced by the beginning of the message. It was, in fact, a nice day: a very nice day. It was the day I had perfected the TwitDot.
My wife, who has always been the more business-minded of the two of us, suggested that we meet with a lawyer and begin to draw up papers for profiting from the invention.
“I’m not satisfied with that,” I said.
“Now you know how I feel,” she said.
“What I mean,” I said, “is that I want to share it with the world. I’d like to explain to others how to do this.”
“Go ahead,” she said. “No one will understand.” She was right, in a sense: the explanation was highly abstruse, combining mathematics, complete diagrammatic programming, and applied printing. “It would take you thirty pages at least to explain,” she said. “Who’s going to sit still for that? You’ll never find a magazine or journal that will let you publish your research.” I began to object but she interrupted me with a wave of the hand. “I’m spending the weekend with some friends,” she said. “I have a train to catch.”
I sat, alone, and considered her objections. On the one hand, everything she said made perfect sense. The technology was hard to explain. It would take up nearly thirty pages. It was hard to imagine convincing any magazine or newspaper to give me the space necessary to bring my invention to the world. It seemed likely that my research would never be published. And yet, on the other hand …
A few months back, when dusk wasn’t yet unspooling overhead at 5 pm, I attended an early-evening picnic. I hardly knew any of the people circled around the spread, and feeling mildly anti-social, I resolved to simply munch on baby carrots and enjoy the fresh air. But as the hummus evolved towards that final stage where people semi-grossly swipe at it with their fingers, an equally mute attendee rotated toward me and introduced herself. She was a friend-of-a-friend-of-a-friend (or something) and we exchanged polite conversation for 10 or 15 minutes. It was superficial talk, the kind of half-hearted chatter that never drifts from biographical descriptors for fear of becoming a discussion of actual substance and thus real focus and mental energy.
Soon we were all standing, packing trash and Tupperware into various canvas tote bags. Ambling home, I hadn’t taken five steps when I realized—suddenly, like an electric memory—what was so novel about that conversation: We never told each other what we did for a living. Sure, we talked about how we knew our mutual friends, and our weekend pastimes, and other pseudo-personal factoids. But neither of us had asked the other about our work. And I admit this may sound hyperbolic, but I think there’s a genuine chance that’s the first time that’s ever happened in Washington, D.C.
Look, it’s not really our fault. You meet someone new in D.C., you ask them about their job. Even long since having observed this custom and thinking it noxious, I still find myself guilty of it more than I’d like. This city is like constantly running into a work-friend at the gym: “What are you doing here?” It’s just one of the plagues of living in this town, something so grin-and-bear-it commonplace that I’ve seen people give a little shrug of surrender before asking someone they’ve just met how they draw a salary. It may be generational, with us Millenials more career-centric and less decorous than our forebears. But the phenomenon remains a D.C. stalwart. And the underlying reason for this tacky shtick is simple: not too many Washingtonians move here for any reason other than a job. Washington isn’t usually a place where people explore themselves and see where their passions might lay. People tend not to move here on an airy whim. We don’t have the warm quirk of San Francisco, the infinite potency of New York, the good-natured sentiment of Chicago. We have politics, basically, and the employment that comes with it.
The Washington professional zoology has a few specific archetypes. Schmoozy, tassle-shoed lobbyists bringing two martinis back to the table. Nonprofit workers and big-hearted activists bleeding themselves for petition signatures. Certainty-consumed congressional staffers cloaked in sweaty intensity, obsessing over fiery but meaningless battles on whatever political foofaraw has erupted that day. We’ve also got contractors, think tankers and more lawyers than any reasonable society should need. All told, this one-industry town combines to spawn a few special dynamics. For one, there’s an innate competitiveness that comes from floating in the same fishbowl—which helps breed the kinds of status-check questions I somehow avoided during that autumn picnic. But more importantly, our shared politico-obsession can at times drain us of our perspective.
The fear of losing panoramic balance is nothing new. Life magazine in January 1942 groaned about this as wartime mania was bubbling: “Any rural cracker-barrel attracts a greater diversity of viewpoints than Washington does. Here is a strictly artificial city, the only major capital in the world that produces nothing but government. Here is a city without any balance whatever, with everyone boring everyone else to death talking shop, a city that cannot be a community because its interests are not communal but identical.”
In circa-now Washington, alas, plus ça change. It’s true that other great capitals of the world don’t appear to have this problem. Paris, Berlin, London, Sydney, Bangkok—these are all vibrant cultural and commercial centers in which the primped political establishment is simply part of the show. Perhaps if the capital of the United States were located in some other major city, much of the material for the superficial burlesque of Washington would vanish. But it isn’t, and a centrally self-admiring and monotonic culture we remain. I imagine it’s a lot like living in one-note Hollywood, with its enclave of slime-ball agents and dumb-headed producers eyeing the offloading busloads of wide-eyed wannabe-ingénues, elevated into a kind of cocaine-laced nobility. Washington’s aristocracy is similarly buttressed by a singular industry, a city that’s little more than a sprawling marble office park dotted with memorials and museums.
Ultimately, this obsessive toiling in federal government, as Life noted a lifetime ago, creates a veneer of artifice. It’s not just easy to get lost amid it all, but it seems practically destiny. And while many of my fellow D.C.-ites are able to row against the current to focus on What’s Really Important, sometimes the big picture of national politics simply gets lost. The obvious truth about Washington is that this city can forget—surrounded by the disingenuous whirlwind of rabid twaddle and hour-by-hour cable-TV “wins” and “losses”—that there are practical impacts to our actions. The work can feel simply, regrettably, theoretical.
It shouldn’t. The voting for president begins in just six weeks, and there is no worse time for us in Washington to forget why we moved here. This is the thought that hit me while watching the recent GOP debate in Michigan, where Rick Perry had his widely mocked and now narrative-defining brain freeze “oops” moment. (Thank merciful heavens, by the way, that we somehow avoided calling it “oops-gate,” or did we decide to no longer tiredly attach “-gate” to every miserable little scandal and I just missed the celebratory cake and punch?) By momentarily forgetting the third agency he has lined up for eradication, Perry reinforced the depthless confidence that makes him the alpha and the omega of the GOP’s chuckle-brained simpletons.
But so what if Perry is out of his element, that it’s not entirely clear he could pour water out of one of his cowboy boots with instructions written on the heel? The moment matters because the post-debate conversation naturally gravitated toward the man’s assumed intellectual impotence without real discussion of: wait, what would happen if we razed those three federal departments—Commerce, Education and (trivia question in 2020 alert!) Energy? Perry’s elimination-fantasy triptych isn’t even the largest libertarian daydream. Ron Paul—the beatific doctor-congressman from, yes, Texas—believes we should do away with five federal departments, a fact he unhelpfully reminded Perry as the poor fellow was plumbing his mental recesses in front of 3.3 million flabbergasted viewers.
Three departments, five departments, whatever. It’s all politicking glib fatuousness. We’ve already covered how the nut bars running to become my boss argue that my co-workers and I don’t help people, that we’re tone-deaf to what “real America” wants and needs, and so irkingly on. And when I roll my eyes and sigh in dismissive opposition, it’s not turf-protection—we truly believe we are of assistance. We think this because we’re aware there is something more amplitudinously awful than an inherently unwieldy federal bureaucracy. Despite the GOP’s vision of government office buildings burning in flames in some kind of divinely theophanous act, actually imagining the true outcome if they got their way appears to take a power beyond their ken.
I would love to see some kind of Back to the Future Hill Valley/Hell Valley alternate-timeline scenario depicting how our brave colonial-garbed no-tax-aficionados would act when faced with the kind of government immolation they crave. Ignore for the moment all the ethereal machinery regarding fiscal policy and Medicare percentages and foreign relations and other intangibles. Think about your morning today. Your radio wasn’t a jumbled mess thanks to the FCC. And those weather reports only occur due to the National Weather Service (under the umbrella of the Commerce Department—hope Texas doesn’t need any hurricane or tornado warnings). On the way to work from the house you might’ve bought with governmental help in the form of the mortgage interest tax deduction, you may have your life saved thanks to federal regulations mandating seat belts and child safety seats. OSHA has your back against unsafe work conditions. The FDA labels food against manufacturers’ desires so you know what you’re actually eating. The EPA works to improve air and water quality. Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
My apologies for the cliché-a-thon; the point is not to flatly throw hosannas at government. But we—the scores of Washingtonians working in those efforts and others—admittedly can get swept up in the over-exerted silliness and forget that the Republican nomination process is little more than a feckless bullhorn loudly portraying our work as a malevolent force that invades folks’ lives and, I don’t know, eats at their soul. Your tax dollars, which pay my salary, don’t create benefits that you get immediately, and usually you can’t even touch them. But, honest, when we’re not distracted by the exclusive fog of lobbytalk and news-cycle worship, we’re focused on the task at hand. In this city, it can be hard to avoid it.
So, when the right talks about an out-of-touch political elite, they’re right, though it’s not really us. It’s something far scarier—a blisteringly uninterested GOP candidate pool that leads legions of beclouded true-believer goofs and who, when sizing up Washington’s work, offer up a sad, stifling indifference.