user-avatar
Today is Wednesday
May 23, 2012

Category: Fun Stuff

January 9, 2012

A McSweeneys Books Preview: An Excerpt from Vicky Swanky Is a Beauty by Diane Williams

by admin — Categories: Fun Stuff — Tags: , , , , Comments Off

In Vicky Swanky Is a Beauty, Diane Williams lays bare the urgency and weariness that shape our lives in stories honed sharper than ever. With sentences auguring revelation and explosion, Williams’s unsettling stories—a cryptic meeting between neighbors, a woman’s sexual worries, a graveside discussion, a chimney on fire—are narrated with razor-sharp tongues and naked, uproarious irreverence.

These fifty stories hum with tension, each one so taut that it threatens to snap and send the whole thing sprawling—the mess and desire, the absurdity and hilarity, the bruises and bleeding, the blushes and disappointments and secrets. An audacious, unruly tour de force, Vicky Swanky Is a Beauty cements Diane Williams’ position as one of the best practitioners of the short form in literature today.

Today we offer a sneak peek at four stories from the book. To purchase it, please visit our store.

- – -

BETWEEN MIDNIGHT AND 6 AM

Women were not a major ingredient in my thinking at that time.

She was blonde, very small, and if I remember right she had big breasts. Uh, Arthur was sleeping on a couch in the living room so I can imagine there was traipsing going on. Mother had her bedroom next to the kitchen. The girl had to go through the apartment in order to get to the bathroom.
I spent the night on the stairs, not dozing off.

She was a bankrupt.

As for me, I could have put more into this. Mother wants her sons to get ahead.

It must have been very soon after that that Mother said, “Ohhhh, Ka-a-a-a-a-y!”

We loved Kay better than we loved our mother. But by glancing back, as I approach middle age, the scale of things quite slowly, calmly, becomes a peep-show.

And everybody had to share. And there was a sliding glass door into the breakfast nook—so there was a curtain over it.

I met with some success. I took a job as a chemical mix-man—to store, order, and prepare wet and dry chemicals.

O Kay!

I’m only warming up. Most of my work is routine labor. There’s an element of physical danger. It is not easy to have this job. I’m not the outdoors type.

Today I got the temperature level too high in the chemical levels in the glass plate processing room and had to get buckets of ice.
Sometimes I’m over a barrel—my wife and I agree.

To get anywhere in my life at this time!—rather, to get anywhere near my wife at this time!—that can take days. I have to go through the kitchen, the laundry—I have to go through hell! Not entirely true.

I ate by myself.

I went to our bedroom with a glass of water for her in the hopes of hearing her cheery cry.

She’s so warm—she’s kind and she’ll likely say, “Hi!”

Her hands were folded behind her head. She whispered, modestly.

This will pep me up.

From all outward appearances, there was substantial risk for lack of concentration, overenthusiastic response, unrealistic desires, emotional craving, weak discipline, pettiness, a tendency to show off, and temporary stops to take a breath.

- – -

RELIGIOUS BEHAVIOR

“You think you are a do-gooder,” Mother said, “don’t you? You’re a do-gooder.”

After a minute, no more, a newcomer looked toward me, a toddler with her mother, I’d bet.

“These type of people,” Mother said.

“See that large bird?” I said.

“I don’t know,” Mother said.

The toddler acted as if she knew me.

It’s so interesting when a little person is so clearly distinguished. I can tell—by the superciliary arches above her eyes, the ultra-tiny hands. I regard this visitant as unreal.

- – -

THE NEWLY MADE SUPPER

The guest’s only wish is to see anyone who looks like Betsy, to put his hands around this Betsy’s waist, on her breasts. He’s just lost a Betsy. He followed Betsy.

In front of Betsy, who supports on her knees her dinner dish, you can see the guest approach.

“You got your supper?” he says, “Betsy?”

And Betsy says, “Who’s that in the purple shirt?”

“That’s not purple. You say purple?” says the guest.

“What color would you say that is?” says Betsy.

“That’s magenta.”

“I have to look that up. Magenta!” says Betsy.

“That’s magenta,” says the guest.

“That’s lavender,” says another woman who’s a better Betsy.

- – -

A MAN, AN ANIMAL

At the cinema I watched closely the camels, the horses, the young actor taking his stance for the sexual act.

He started up with a pretty girl we had a general view of.

I felt the girl’s pallor stick into me.

Another girl, in pink swirls alternating with yellow swirls, intruded.

The girls were like the women who will one day have to have round-the-clock duty at weddings, at birthdays, at days for the feasts.

Unaccountably, I hesitated on the last step of the cinema’s escalator when we were on our way out, and several persons bumped into me.

An ugly day today—I didn’t mention that, with fifty mile per hour winds.

But here is one of the more fortunate facts: We were Mr. and Mrs. Gray heading home.

It has been said—the doors of a house should always swing into a room. They should open easily to give the impression to those entering that everything experienced inside will be just as easy.

A servant girl was whipping something up when we arrived, and she carried around the bowl with her head bowed.

We’ve been told not to grab at breasts.

Before leaving for Indiana in the morning—where I had to clean up arrangements for a convention—I stood near my wife to hear her speak. So, who is she and what can I expect further from her?

What she did, what she said in the next days, weeks and years, addresses the questions Americans are insistently, even obsessively asking—but what sorts of pains in the neck have I got?

Please forgive our confusion and our failures. We make our petitions—say our prayers. It’s like our falling against a wall, in a sense.

On a recent day, my wife gave me a new scarf to wear as a present. It’s chrome green. Her mother Della, on that same day, had helped her to adjust to her hatred of me.

I’d have to say, I’ve given my wife a few very pleasant shocks, too.

- – -

To purchase Vicky Swanky Is a Beauty, click here.

January 9, 2012

In These Deserts: War Stories From Afghanistan: Column 21: Epilogue by Nathan Bradley

by admin — Categories: Fun Stuff — Tags: , , , , , , , , Comments Off

The best way to describe my opinion of the plot of the movie The Hurt Locker is as follows: imagine watching The Silence of the Lambs, except at inopportune dramatic moments the characters spring into a Bollywood song-and-dance number. Clarice Starling and Hannibal Lecter are inexplicably warbling in Hindi in his jail cell flanked by prancing elephants and choreographed dancers in lab coats. Then, it’s suddenly serious again, as if nothing had happened.

That said, when explaining the feeling of returning to the real world, there’s a part of the film that actually gets it completely right. Near the end, when Sergeant James can’t save the guy with the bomb locked to his body, the aftermath of the explosion and chaos suddenly cuts to a scene of James cleaning the gutters at his house, James wearing civilian clothes, James confused by the absurd plenty of a local supermarket. That is what it feels like.

My friends let me stay with them in a hotel in Anchorage on my first night home, and jet lag kept me awake and alert while two beers kept me almost dangerously intoxicated. I felt great—I felt nothing but hope and excitement. Within twenty-four hours, I had my truck out of storage and was scouting for a place to live. Within three days I had rented a house, and the absolute terror that I felt when I realized that I was sleeping unarmed gave me an indication that things might not be so easy.

In truth, the startled moments and the unease went away pretty quickly. The boredom, however, set in almost immediately upon returning to work, and though the month’s vacation that I spent in Washington, D.C. was a welcome reprieve, the frustrations of transitioning back to garrison life (and an office job) seemed overwhelming. I made up my mind that I was going to get out of the Army—the excitement was gone, the war seemed to be following an endless cycle, and my disappointment at the news was matched only by my desire to go back there, back to a place where I felt relevant.

I studied journalism in college, and it seemed an ideal profession to pursue. I fully intended to move to Kabul and start work as a freelancer. I contacted some old colleagues who worked in the Afghanistan-Pakistan region. They had some great advice: first, don’t try to contact the Taliban yourself. Second, make sure you have a lot of money saved up. Third, don’t expect work in the wintertime—the war practically shuts down in Kabul. Expatriates and government wonks can be snotty, they said, and don’t expect a good nightlife.

Still, it sounded better than getting up at 5 a.m. every morning to stand in the inevitably freezing Alaskan air, to prepare legion PowerPoint slides for training meetings, training synch meetings, command and staff meetings, brigade air operations meetings and the like. In the span of two weeks of traveling back from the war zone that had become my home, I had gone from T.E. Lawrence to Milton Waddams.

During a speech at West Point, Defense Secretary Robert Gates made a comment that stuck with me: “Men and women in the prime of their professional lives, who may have been responsible for the lives of scores or hundreds of troops, or millions of dollars in assistance, or engaging or reconciling warring tribes, may find themselves in a cube all day reformatting PowerPoint slides. The consequences of this terrify me.’’

That was me, and there was nothing to be done. Nobody liked their jobs: that was the dirty secret of what coming home actually meant. The consequences that I experienced were: contempt, bitterness, despair and a desire to drink to excess on a regular basis. My work was unpleasantly simple and mundane. I’d spend my idle time in the office researching apartments for sale in Buenos Aires, townhouses for sale in Washington D.C. or organic farming cooperatives in (no joke) Nagorno-Karabakh. I’d spend my weekends hammered reading the depressing Afghanistan updates posted on the New York Times by C.J. Chivers or Dexter Filkins. I hated every minute of it, and I was ready to leave it all behind to go somewhere and do something real.

That is, until the morning that I checked my email and discovered that the Army’s Human Resources Command had corrected a clerical error it made in 2007: the terms of my enlistment had been updated, and the earliest date on which I could exit the military had shifted from June 2011 to May 2014. It was all my own fault, but the information I had received every time I queried had clearly stated 2011. So, heart-set on finding a new occupation, I instead found myself staring at the next four years and the implications therein. It didn’t help much that a girl had broken my heart a few weeks before. Everything seemed to be in free-fall. I would have deployed back to Afghanistan in a heartbeat if they had just let me.

And then, unbelievably, the opportunity to write this column arose. Then, two days after I received word that I had the chance to publish my story, a unique opportunity to deploy to Central America and work in humanitarian assistance for six months arose, too. Of course I accepted. Looking back on this past year, it’s easy to imagine that none of it had ever been in doubt, that it was always going to transpire this way, but honestly it’s terrifying to think about what might have happened if it hadn’t. No one who survived the war is a stranger to blind fate, to the abritrary nature that decides who lives or dies, and so there’s no reason to dwell on it. That was just how it was.

Sharing my story has been an absolute privilege, even if the story wasn’t always positive. I’ve been particularly thankful to receive messages from other soldiers, especially the ones who deployed with me and who recognized themselves in my writing. They are the most terrifying jury of my peers that I could possibly imagine, and I hope I’ve done right by what took place.

Finally, an update on what’s happened since I left:

My interpreters Tony and Santos (the interpreter who helped me with Abdulhaq) are still in Afghanistan and working for the coalition. I hope that they get their visas in Fiscal Year 2012, but I have no influence. We still keep in touch via Facebook, and though I can’t do much from here, I’m thankful that they’re safe.

I wrote Brian’s parents a letter after he died, and I have since become friends with them. They and their family adopted my detachment and sent us dozens of care packages throughout our deployment. They are the most generous and kind people I have ever met.

My soldier Tony, with whom I went on leave, got out of the Army and is now in training to be a locomotive engineer. He had a rough year, too, but things are getting better, he says. He lives in Atlanta, and I’m going to go see him one of these days.

Khan is still there and still working for the governor’s office. He had the governor’s spokesman write out an email that he dictated; he says his kids still ask him when they can come over to his friends’ house to play again. I’m still holding out hope that I will get to talk to him again. I tried calling him on Skype once, but the connection is terrible and my Pashto is not much better.

Governor Katawazai is now the deputy chief of the Afghan National Directorate of Security. I’m sure he’s doing alright. He is a canny survivor above all things.

My battalion commander has become a huge supporter of my writing, and is a voice of reason when I feel like I’m going insane. We were all more than lucky to have so conscientious a person in charge of us over there. He’s still in the Army for now.

Most of my soldiers from the compound have left the military. I don’t blame them; they saw the ill-lubricated gears of the war grinding on an hourly basis. I still talk to most of them, and I envision us all as aging, cranky vets at some distant reunion. Some of them are back in Afghanistan already. All of the ones who stayed in our battalion will be back by the end of this year. I worry about all of them.

I never saw Abdulhaq again. All of my experience gives me the impression that he probably held on to that letter. Maybe I’ll see it again someday. Maybe I’ll even see him. I’m enrolled in a program that will have me studying intensive Pashto soon, and with luck I’ll actually learn that language well enough to truly communicate what I want to say. I know I’d recognize him if we ever crossed paths.

A few days after I published the column about Shams ul-Haq and Syed ur-Rahman, I received word from Tony that their father had been captured and beheaded by the local insurgency. Not even religious leaders are safe in that conflict, and it was a sad reminder of just how fragile things really are over there.

I contacted both Tony and Santos and asked them if they could get in contact with the family. I know that they must have cousins and uncles who will provide for them—kinship is important above all else there—but they just lost their father, the head of the household and the only one employed. The boys are just two of eight kids. I wanted to see if I might be able to send some money: a thousand dollars to try and keep them on their feet for the time being.

It’s extraordinarily hard to wire money to Afghanistan, and so rather than sending it directly to the boys (whose personal information I didn’t really know), I asked Santos if I could wire it to him instead and have him deliver it in cash. Getting the particulars of his bank account took about a week’s worth of back-and-forth messages on Facebook. In the meantime, I had to attend the 2011 U.S. Army Maneuver Conference in Columbus, Georgia, where I encountered my old company commander—not the awful one, but rather the one for whom I served as a platoon leader before deployment.

Waiting in the hallway before whatever afternoon speech fell next on the schedule, I asked him what he thought of my plan. I told him that I figured it was my obligation: I make in a week what an Afghan family makes in a year, and if the interpreters give them the money, I know it’s not going to the insurgency. He unequivocally disapproved, and was angry that I would even suggest it. In his opinion, it was just a means of making myself feel righteous, and in truth they were going to either make it or starve to death, and the sooner they figured out which, the better. I asked him what kind of employment he expected a ten-year-old and a twelve-year-old to find. “I know plenty of ANA commanders who would love to have them as chai boys,” he said, making reference to the almost ubiquitous practice of child sex abuse and victimization that takes place among Afghans. Almost everyone I know who’s deployed there has some story of encountering it.

All around us in the re-purposed ironworks of a convention center were defense contractor booths hawking new technologies: new optics for snipers, new drone aircraft, new camouflage, new armed combat vehicles, new assault rifles, new mortar tubes, new munitions, new armaments. The networking and glad-handing taking place between the lines in this conference would clearly lead to new acquisitons, to billions of dollars changing hands between the Department of Defense and the familiar names like Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, BAE Systems, General Dynamics, the companies whose skyscrapers loom over Arlington, Virginia and line the capitol like medieval siege towers. When the irony of the scene struck me, the solution became obvious. I sent the money.

January 9, 2012

Teddy Waynes Unpopular Proverbs: Silence by Teddy Wayne

by admin — Categories: Fun StuffComments Off

SILENCE IS GOLDEN!!!!!!!!

January 6, 2012

American Policy Suggestions from a Chicago Sports Fan: The Bears Fired Jerry Angelo, But Is It Enough to Save the Economy? by Matt McKenna

by admin — Categories: Fun Stuff — Tags: , , , Comments Off

- – -

Most Americans are familiar with the two economic bubbles that severely disrupted the U.S. economy during the aughts: the dot-com bubble that burst in 2001 and the real estate bubble that began to deflate in 2006. Blame for these speculative manias have been hurled—fairly and unfairly—at myriad individuals and organizations. Many pundits blame politicians for lack of oversight. Fault has also been directed towards the financial institutions that gambled away the national economy for short-term profit. Still others blame regular, “main street” Americans who personally over-leveraged themselves. With so many accusations of stupidity and impropriety bandied about, it is a wonder that nary a word has been written or uttered regarding the most damaging catalyst of modern economic bubbles. This, of course, is a problem since all the well-meaning regulation our government can muster will be for naught if it doesn’t first address the market distorting effects of former Chicago Bears general manager Jerry Angelo.

To understand the economic bubbles of the previous decade, one must first understand another type of bubble introduced by the recently dismissed Angelo administration. These bubbles were and are created not by inflated stock prices or outrageous valuations, but by building a sub-par Bears team that nonetheless goes on to have an inexplicably fantastic season. Examples of “win bubbles” include a Chicago team that had no business going 13-3 and winning the division in 2001 and another that played in the 2006 Super Bowl despite starting Rex Grossman at quarterback. Like all bubbles, these win bubbles eventually burst, and chagrined Bears fans are left to ponder why they bothered to put on clothes and walk to the bar just to see their hapless team get crushed by three touchdowns to one of the lesser franchises in one of the lesser divisions in a game in which the opposing team was missing crucial members of their offensive line and were clearly outmatched on both sides of the ball. The pain, however, is not limited solely to Bears fans. Indeed, once optimism in the Bears’ future playoff opportunities falters, it is empirically demonstrable that economic bubbles will soon start to pop and the stock market will tank. This is the pain felt by the wider economy.

Jerry Angelo became the General Manager for Chicago Bears in 2001, inheriting a 5-11 club and a stock market that had already dropped 27% between January 1st and September 23rd when the Bears notched their first win of the season. The Bears then rattled off five more consecutive victories and went on to surprise sports and economic analysts by accumulating a 13-3 record. Fan expectations for the next season rose, and the economy appeared to stabilize. By the time the regular season ended with the Bears as an unlikely division champion, the S&P was up 21% from its 2001 low point.

Of course, that’s not the end of the story. After a brutal home playoff loss to the Philadelphia Eagles and a disheartening 4-12 follow-up season, expectations once again plummeted. This correction propelled the dot-com bust to new lows and lead to a -22.10% annual return for the S&P 500 in 2002.

As dramatic as the collapse of the 2001 win bubble was, it pales in comparison to the 2006 version. The Bears finished the previous season with a respectable 11-5 record and a trip to the playoffs. Fans, still skeptical from the previous bubble, were cautiously optimistic about the next season’s possibilities. To the (temporary) joy of Bears followers and economists alike, the 2006 season was even more spectacular than could reasonably be hoped as the team finished the regular season 13-3 and made it all the way to the Super Bowl. The stock market responded and the S&P 500’s annual return shot up to 15.79%.

Although pundits and fans were initially bullish on the Bears chances for the following 2007 season, a sense of unease slithered its way throughout Chicagoland after the ugly loss to the Indianapolis Colts in Super Bowl XLI. Those fears, sadly, were warranted. As the Bears tragically finished the 2007 season with a losing record, the S&P annual return dropped more than 10% from the previous year as the concomitant housing bubble began to burst. Unfortunately, a single year was not enough time to absorb all the disappointment endured by such a pathetic follow up effort to a promising Super Bowl season. Thus, by 2008, the win bubble that catalyzed the housing bubble that catalyzed the worldwide financial crisis was in full effect. The S&P’s annual return for 2008 was a ghastly -37.00%, and the world economy has yet to fully recover.

Heading into 2012, economists and Chicago sports columnists should be gravely concerned because all indicators show that Angelo has once again produced a win bubble. The Bears 2010 season ended in surprise appearance in the NFC Championship game—a game few analysts felt the Bears had a chance to win because there existed no good explanation for how the Bears got there in the first place. Not surprisingly, the Bears 2011 season was a disappointment, ending with a 8-8 record despite a relatively easy schedule. Sound familiar? It should: this sort of out-of-nowhere-wonderful season followed up by a heinously terrible season is the unmistakable indicator of a win bubble. Now that we’ve seen a win bubble, will we also see the bursting of another economic bubble in 2012? I certainly wouldn’t bet against it.

What can be done to stabilize the Chicago Bears success and subsequently the economy? Well, firing Angelo was a start: his tenure as general manager has been fraught with bubbles of all stripes, and the team/economy clearly needs a new direction lest the suffering continue. It is now up to all of us to hold the Bears organization responsible for putting a team together that is geared towards long-term success and economic growth rather than short-term playoff appearances with booms and shameful, shameful busts.

January 6, 2012

Aliens With Benefits by Teddy Wayne

by admin — Categories: Fun Stuff — Tags: , , , , , , , Comments Off

Amigos, welcome to America! It’s okay, you can come out of hiding—we don’t care that you’re so-called “illegal aliens.” In fact, we love aliens, as long as they’re cute and cuddly, like E.T., or willing to work below minimum wage while being exploited at jobs most Americans won’t touch, like you!

Just because you’re here illegally doesn’t mean we’re withholding your slice of good ol’ American apple pie that you baked under a fast-food franchise’s heat lamp. There’s much controversy about whether you should be insured in our health care system. Well, you can put your mind at ease, after you’ve finished your 16-hour shift, because you’re covered for a host of ailments and preventative care treatments, such as lung-cancer screenings for all those toxic chemicals you’re inhaling in the factories or wherever to ensure that you can continue working until you retire at 85.

And what good is your health if you’re not able to enjoy it in your golden years? That’s why we’re instituting the new 401(k)(ia) plan for illegal aliens. For every cent you put into a pension from your $2.50 hourly wage, the government will take it, invest it, then give the original amount back to you in 40 years so that you don’t lose it—free of charge!

What about dental insurance, you ask? How do free toothbrushes every six months with our dentist’s phone number on them sound? Heck, we’ll even throw in some barely used floss.

A guy in our office also found a pair of backup glasses from eight years ago that just might fit a certain someone’s prescription.

Paying someone to take care of your kids during the day can be prohibitively expensive, so under the Illegal Alien Child Care Bill your children will be legally permitted to work alongside you. Don’t forget to snap a picture of junior’s first time helming the slaughterhouse deboner!

You will receive time off for all our major holidays: Flag Day and New Year’s Half-Hour.

We know you came to the United States for greater opportunity, to escape oppressive regimes, and because our reality shows are great and you should buy the wonderful products advertised in their entertaining commercials. Providing you with benefits is our way of saying, “You’re welcome!” and keeping you just enough above water to encourage your relatives back home to join in the fun and risk their lives crossing the border. In return, we simply ask that you work hard, abstain from bathroom breaks, and agree every election cycle to serve as a scapegoat.

Finally, you’ll receive the greatest benefit of all: a tax rebate (because your income will now be recorded and taxed in the highest bracket—hey, floss doesn’t grow on trees!). To guarantee you’re first in line, end-of-year filing is due January 1. We suggest using New Year’s Half-Hour to complete it.

January 6, 2012

Non-Essential Mnemonics: Strippers, while tantalizing, can rarely provide comfortpretty looking but empty inside. by Kent Woodyard

by admin — Categories: Fun StuffComments Off

My buddy, Dave, shares some hard-learned lessons from his years spent in the company of girls named after luxury cars (Mercedes) and Cardinal virtues (Chastity). Also, a mnemonic for the title sponsors of the Holiday Bowl since its inception (Sea World, Thrifty Car Rental, Plymouth, Culligan, Pacific Life, Bridgepoint Education Inc).

January 6, 2012

Stumpin With Randy by Ted Travelstead

by admin — Categories: Fun Stuff — Tags: , , , Comments Off

Stumping is a vastly important aspect of politics that often gets overlooked in the face of the ever-changing media landscape.

Whether it’s a “whistle stop tour” or quickly popping into a small town general store for a little homemade apple butter and small talk, the power of meeting people IN PERSON, and getting your message across in the process, can’t be stressed enough. In addition, a great stump speech can sway the tide in a close election!

Are you a political candidate who needs help with your stumping?

Randy, or “Stumpin’ Randy” to some, comes from a long line of stumpers with a rich political history. His great-great-grandfather, Randy, was the first man to ever cut a tree down just to give a speech on its stump. Randy is an expert on stumping or “stumpin’” as he calls it (folks find this adorable).

Randy’s been in the political game for ages, and his experience and unique approach are what keep him continually in demand as a stumpin’ strategist and coach. Let it be known that his name has been uttered in virtually every government building on the planet. Ask any politician about Randy and they’ll either smile, or shake their fist. He’s that good!

Little known facts about Randy:

  • Camp David was nearly named after him.
  • Once talked a room full of youth pastors into believing he was an Asian woman.
  • Was not involved in any way with 2000 Presidential Election.
  • Has memorized the location of all fallen space debris.
  • Often referred to as “The Lee Atwater of the North.”

Randy doesn’t care about your political affiliation. He’s a non-partisan stumpin’ coach, that cares only about making you the best stumper you can be.

Some of the things you are guaranteed to learn from Randy:

  • The “Inverted Toe Grab,” the “Spring-Heel Push,” and other creative STUMP STANCES™ that will set you apart if you find yourself actually standing on a stump, stumpin’!
  • How to communicate, “This homemade peach pie is delicious. Can I count on your vote come November?” with just a handshake.
  • How to wear a straw boater and arm garter, and still appear politically relevant.
  • How to silence any angry mob with a simple smoke bomb and a handful of glitter.
  • How to tactfully avoid eating most varieties of potato salad.

There are a select few people out there that don’t quite jibe with Randy’s teachings. Some have called him “difficult” and “unsettling,” but usually those are folks who have trouble comprehending Randy’s genius, and end up crumpling in the face of unique visionaries. If you give yourself over to Randy’s wisdom, CULLED FROM YEARS OF EXPERIENCE, your political future will be abundant. That being said, there are a few “eccentricities” you should know about before you meet the man. Just for your own comfort!

Things to know when Randy enters a room:

  • Please don’t grab at, or refer in conversation to, Randy’s homemade “stumpin’ hat.” That feather in the brim has been listed in the National Register of Historic Places.
  • A handshake from Randy may last longer than you are used to, or comfortable with. Please be patient, and open to change.
  • Randy doesn’t pronounce the letter “H.” It is silent to him. Don’t let this frighten you.
  • Randy possesses the uncanny ability to “read teeth,” and just may be able to determine your political future based on this. If he asks you to give him “some peeks,” you’d be wise to open wide.
  • Randy gets “screechy” when deprived of food or sleep.

Well, there you have it. Are you ready to master the art of stumpin’? The list of successful political household names that Randy has helped is too long to print here, but once you give over to Randy and his knowledge, you’re on your way to being on that list.

Now let’s get stumpin’!

With Randy!

January 6, 2012

The Long Walk: A Column About Washington: Engagement Season by Alec Bings

by admin — Categories: Fun Stuff — Tags: , , , Comments Off

For years, a list has floated around the Internet attempting to make a grandiose point about the value of voting. It’s Reader’s Digest-type stuff, the kind of crude summary you might see used by a lazy high school civics teacher or in an email that’s been forwarded along a half-dozen times. This bit of flotsam catalogs one-vote winning margins throughout history with a popular version showing impressive breadth, citing Oliver Cromwell taking control of England in 1645 and America choosing to use English over German in 1776, both by a single vote. Jesse Jackson, apparently inspired by the list’s power, included its claims in his speech at the 2000 Democratic National Convention, noting that “One vote made Texas part of the United States of America in 1845. One vote changed France from a monarchy to a republic. One vote has the power to change our course.” It makes for pretty rhetoric and a can-do sense of purpose, but regrettably—like almost everything on the Internet—it is total bunk.

None of these claims are true—some quite far from reality—but the “one-vote” list still surfaces time and again. The list popped into my brain around 1:30 am Tuesday, the night of the Iowa caucuses, when CNN’s vacuous chuckle-heads revealed that Mitt Romney was beating Rick Santorum by, you guessed it, one vote. A half-hour later, Santorum nosed ahead by four votes, and by Wednesday morning the final numbers had given Romney his landslide win of eight votes. It’s hard not to find this absurd virtual tie at least somewhat intriguing, despite the fact that these caucuses are an achingly undemocratic, uniformly meaningless practice that directly decides zero delegates. After the silliest process possible—scrawled paper ballots, placed in hats and plastic buckets and later tallied by elderly volunteers by hand—the margin came down to fewer participants than in a regulation basketball game. This faux-decisive folly isn’t to suggest that the process before caucus night followed any sense of logic. Reports in the final days described hapless voters torn between Santorum and Ron Paul, candidates so similar that one wants to bomb Iran to bits and the other wants to all-out ignore it. Ultimately, a tie for the huffily righteous Santorum—a man who believes states can and should outlaw all forms of birth control—allows him to play the front-runner for a while and spew out more mean-spirited untruths over the next few months. And what’s worse, I hope he gets as close as he can to the nomination, if only to make synthetic zillionaire Romney beg for it just a little bit more.

The whole thing is, as always, a bit depressing. Which is probably why I’m so interested in the fact that the vote difference in the 2012 Iowa caucus couldn’t even make a minyan. It appears that votes, even cast in asinine snapshots of a 99 percent white populace, do matter. Sure, more people took part in the 2010 D.C. mayoral race than in Tuesday’s caucuses, but those in Des Moines and Cedar Rapids can’t argue that they didn’t have the option of making a difference. It is true that not many took advantage of the opportunity: of the state’s 2.2 million voters, only 147,000 cast a ballot. And of those, only 122,000 voted in the Republican contest, for a turnout of 5.4 percent. This weak statewide showing, however, offers those who want their opinion heard an even larger platform. The eternal battle to convince both ourselves and others that voting matters is a permanent tradition in political worlds. And Iowa this week presents some symbolic evidence that participation is worthwhile, that engagement can in fact push one’s beliefs forward.

So do these narrow Iowa returns suggest, even if allegorically, an obligation to vote? To “be” political? Most of us in Washington have elected to dedicate ourselves to civic life, so we’ve long since swallowed the premise. But many of our friends and fellow citizens have instead conscientiously declined to take part in politics. This innocent apathy seems like almost a romantic flight of fantasy, the kind of freeing warmth that also pervades every time a movie’s protagonist blissfully falls for another Manic Pixie Dream Girl. Political detachment, to be sure, remains a comforting option. And yet as we learn about the world and read its fine print, we unearth more about the oppressed and the exploited and we realize we have a relationship with them whether we acknowledge it or not. Bloody Engelsian revolution isn’t an option, and so we instead must operate within the boundaries of micro ideology and intuition. Our experiences are offered up to our personal moral intuitions, and our consciences buoy decisions to be made about what feels right or wrong. And if we’re tussling with that struggle, we’d have to be willfully ignorant not to have convictions about the world. It’s these convictions that make us by definition political. And this is how we find ourselves participating in matters of politics—by learning to unearth inner disgust and declaring that if things get worse we can’t be said to have been complicit with inaction.

Much has changed regarding mass civic engagement in the last few years. Think back to 2008. When the political right faced a Mack truck of participation in government on the left, they began a ground-war against it, painting that involvement as some kind of unsavory cult worship. Yet when the enthusiasm gap flipped on its head a year or two later leading to a nationwide congressional town-hall shout-fest, that participation was hailed as purely emblematic of American freedom. But this isn’t a partisan issue. Theoretical studies on the psychological benefits of political participation have found that people who engage are more satisfied with their lives thanks to subsequent feelings of autonomy and relatedness. This realization echoes a long-standing understanding in political theory dating back to Aristotle, an argument suggesting that political activity matters because of its effects on the individual citizen and his relationship to the system—regardless of any actual outcomes. In other words, you and seven friends may not always be able to make the difference in an election, but your instinctive sensation of virtuous connection might make it all worth it.

Let’s face it, people are going to vote. It can either be you or it can be the people who actually “see more now” after GoDaddy.com commercials air. It’s up to you. There’s little surprise that after generations of young people getting dominated by their grandparents at the ballot box that issues like Medicare and Social Security get more attention and funding than education and college tuition. (This trend may be changing after 2008 saw more voters under 35 than over 65. We’ll see.) The point is that when you choose not to participate, the conversation shifts—perhaps permanently. You take an election off, and some other group takes your place—and your energy and your capital—and before you know it, you’ve been Wally Pipped into meaninglessness. With countless opportunities to participate, there’s no excuses, really. Some say that politics is an evolutionary substitute for violence, that the societal power that previously moved around at the hand of a weapon is now conducted at the ballot box. To borrow the metaphor, in times like these, it sure feels like we’d be foolish not to keep the tightest of grips on that sword.

January 6, 2012

List: Important New Emoticons by Mira Ptacin and Seth Fried

by admin — Categories: Fun StuffComments Off
+: )     Ash Wednesday
+; )     Flirty Ash Wednesday
 : F    Bored snake
[>: (  Fire bad
[I: I  Ice neither good nor bad; me ambivalent
,:" I   Attacked by cat
:%I    Lowering glasses to see if you’re serious
;%)    Lowering glasses to see if you’re feeling what I’m feeling
:>>q  Accidentally spraying self in eye with mace
O0o  No one in my family has any response to what you just said
<:#    Hitler birthday party
<;#   Flirty Hitler birthday party
X;<)  Flirty triceratops
X,<)  Flirty triceratops cyclops
P Soup ladle
;P   Flirty soup ladle
}: I Wolverine
{: I Frida Kahlo
@: I Combover
:o ) Bear missing ears
:^ u   Abject horror
;^ u   Flirty abject horror
: i      Cold sore
; i    Flirty cold sore

January 4, 2012

Excerpts From My 2012 Day-By-Day Mayan Calendar by Avery Monsen and Jory John

by admin — Categories: Fun Stuff — Tags: , Comments Off

January 1st

Wake up and shake off that hangover, sleepyhead! Take a deep breath and smile. This is the first day of the rest of your life! (The rest of your life, of course, will be 354 days long.)

February 14th – Valentine’s Day

Love is in the air! Also, you’ll notice that there are no honeybees, for some reason. Where did they all go? And what do they know that you don’t?

April 1st – April Fools’ Day

We’ve just spoken to some top scientists, and apparently the Mayan calendar was totally incorrect! There’ll be no apocalypse. You’ll get to live a nice, long, healthy life.*

*April Fools! You’ll be dead in exactly 263 days.

May 1st

Today, make a list of the 25 places you always wanted to see. Got em? Okay, now cross off 20.

May 5th – Cinco De Mayo!

Here’s a quick Spanish lesson to help you celebrate: En siete meses, mi vida será una pesadilla tenaz. (Translation: In seven months, my life will be an unrelenting nightmare.)

June 21st

The first day of summer! Grab some brewskis and head for the beach! Wait, does the sun seem closer to anybody else? It’s probably hard to measure that sort of thing, but the sun definitely seems bigger or hotter or something.

July 4th

The Founding Fathers never could have guessed that we’d have our independence for exactly 236 years before the earth imploded in a terrifying inferno. Lucky for them, they’re already dead. God bless America!

August 15th

Today, you should go to your local grocery store and buy as much bottled water as you can. Make sure the cashier doesn’t know where you live, though, or you can bet he’ll come looking for it when all the Earth’s water is on fire.

August 16th

Today, head back the grocer’s and stock up on canned tunafish. You’ll need that protein to nourish your ever-weakening arms when all the fish of the world are on fire.

September 20th

Seems like the bands of looters are becoming more ruthless, huh? Today, take fifteen minutes to visualize killing a home-invader with your bare hands so you won’t hesitate when the time comes. Because the time absolutely will come.

September 26th

[Elaborate blueprint of a man-trap.]

October 31st

Happy Halloween! Don’t even think about opening the door tonight. In fact, now is as good a time as any to barricade the doors and windows.

November 2nd

What the fuck was that noise? WHAT THE FUCK WAS THAT NOISE?!

December 20th

On this second to last night of Earth, you, the reader, and I, the professional-calendar-man/survival expert, are connected. As you gaze down at these words, our hearts beat as one and, though we’ve never met face to face, in a very real sense, we have shared something. A year of laughs, a year of tears, a year of elaborate homemade boobytraps and DIY weaponry. In this world with no future and and a quickly-fading present, a connection is all we have. Tomorrow is your last day. Spend it with someone you love.

December 21st

If you don’t have someone to love and if you live near the Denver area, please send a full body pic to endofdays69@aol.com. I have five spare gas masks and an industrial-sized vat of sexual lubricant. Good luck.

© 2012 Daily Giggles All rights reserved